Pass the victims, please
The secret weapon, I think, that the GOP deploys to convince the low information Pig People to vote for whatever appalling candidate or hair-brained scheme-du-jour is their incredible ability to be the victim.
The victim of what, you ask?
What have you got, I reply. We see it from the homophobes at NOM who claim that Marriage Equality means that they cannot express themselves as Xristians (victims), to the 1 Percenters who think that they are victims of the Occupy movement. If the Xristian Xrazies and the rest of Wingnuttia didn’t have victimization to fall back on, I don’t think that they would get out of bed in the morning. But I digress…
Today we are treated to the spectacle of infamous bomb-thrower Newt Gingrich. Over the past month, no one has done more to take Mitt Romney down a peg or two in the opinion polls. The sustained attack on Bain Capital have been very successful and Newticles snide and sneering tone has been a joy to watch. The right despises him because he broke Saint Ronnie’s eleventh commandment.
So you would think that Republicans everywhere would be delighted that Newticles is about to be pimp-slapped on prime time TeeVee from the woman he done wrong (and cheated on for 6 years before divorcing) who is going to air the dirty laundry about Newt’s various staff-banging infidelities.
You would be wrong.
You see, Newticles is the victim here. Let’s start with the small fry first:
So there’s no questioning staff-banging serial adulterer Newticles credibility.
Now let’s move on to a bigger, dumber fish, Mooselini. Griftzilla of course has an opinion on this and if you guess that it’s the Lamestream Media’s fault, you win a cigar. Anyway, she claims that airing this interview will backfire (on whom? who cares!) and that Newticles will soar like an eagle:
PALIN: I call them dumbarses. They, thinking that by trotting out this old Gingrich divorce interview that’s old news — and it does feature a disgruntled ex, claiming that it would destroy his campaign — all it does, Sean, is incentive conservatives and independents who are so sick of the politics of personal destruction, because it’s played so selectively by media, that their target, in this case Newt, he’s now going to soar even more. Because we know the game now, and we just won’t put up with it.
So the world champ grifter believes, because, well, being the victim is a winning card for her, resentment is her best color when it is blood libel red.
But here’s the big kahuna, this is the proof that you need (if you need any) that being the victim is the trump card in Wingnuttia. Four-times married Junkie Limbaugh knows how to be the victim of a woman, dontchaknow?
But it gets better:
LIMBAUGH: I got a great note from a friend of mine. “So Newt wanted an open marriage. BFD. At least he asked his wife for permission instead of cheating on her. That’s a mark of character, in my book. Newt’s a victim. We all are. Ours is the horniest generation.” [...] That’s from a good friend of mine, “Newt’s slogan ought to, ‘Hell, yes, I wanted it.’” (laughing) I’m sharing with you how some people are reacting to this.
I’m sure by breakfast tomorrow the Pig People will all be murmuring in agreement that Newt’s the victim, that those dirty f***ing hippies are shoving this nasty sex junk in their faces, and that the librul media is to blame, because they have it out for conservatives.
(Conservatives who are staff-banging serial adulterers.)
The men might. But I have an idea that their girlfriends and wives might have a different opinion. And, lest we forget, they vote too. Or, they don’t vote.
That’s right, it’s the liberals who are trying to make sure Mittens is the candidate.
You know, people like the War Criminal Post’s Jennifer Rubin.
~
Um, all these wing nuts read the Bible, so they know.
You can tell this is a liberal plot. All you have to do is compare Newt’s history with how the media covered up the Clinton/Lewinsky activities.
Faux Noise:
Why is Marianne Gingrich’s credibility in question (mentioned twice) just because she hasn’t talked about her marriage for six years? Her sanity for marrying Newt I could understand, but not her credibility.
Thus FlakedMooselini:
This staunch defender of Family Values (TM) declares that asking for an Open Marriage is peachy keen, but she does serve prime, low-calorie, cognition-deficient word-salad.
A Limpballs Scenario:
Limpballs: Everybody knows all about Newticles’ peckerdildoes, and of course, what could an angry ex-spouse add?
Alert Listener: “Er .. Open Marriage …”
Limpballs: “Cut his damn mike!”
[Obviously this is fiction, as the only alert listener to Limpballs’ rants is Media Matters.]
Geez, with all this collusion on the Left, we ought to be able to get that Leftie Willard nominated by week’s end, don’tcha know.
…unless, of course, someone “finds” more lost ballots coated with a strange, Frothy mixture…
Luv it when bitches put other bitches, sorry I mean wom…No I mean bitches…down when they’re not to blame.
She deserved it! Or
How dare she complain that her husband stood with her before their god
and promised to love and obey each other.
Get with the times girlfriend…I mean bitch.
You got a settlement and now your on the teevee picture tube.
Stop your raggin.
Blame the victim. The GOPig code of ethics has never been a benchmark
of rational thinking has it.
[...] spouse since….since….well, since Bill Clinton. Speaking of animal feces. Photo credit Advertisement GA_googleAddAttr("AdOpt", "1"); GA_googleAddAttr("Origin", "other"); [...]