the NYTimes disses the way we write
What a bunch of groussing pussies. Bitches.
What a bunch of groussing pussies. Bitches.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 24th, 2009 at 2:51 pm by Tengrain and is filed under snark. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Mock, Paper, Scissors is proudly powered by
WordPress
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
Apple, the Apple logo, and Mac are trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. The Made on a Mac Badge is a trademark of Apple Computer, Inc., used with permission.
Must be a slow as molasses news day.
Corbett dissed his own industry, and in the process punted any serious attempt at a column while he groused and at the same time sussed out a trend in contemporary editorializing, gussying up his own work in the process.
He should just own it and go with the flow.
This from the “paper of record” that had Judith Miller writing fiction on page one and only started to use the term gay instead of “homosexual” in the fucking 1990s.
They’re just now noticing this? What about the split infititives ad infinitum?
It’s Strunk and White or hit the road, you know!
“Was the New York Times so persnickety about grammar and word choice when they allowed Judith Miller to turn her column over to Donald Rumsfeld’s Pentagon to whore Iraq war propaganda? Just wondering.” — Christopher di Spirito
(Natch, my comment is “Awaiting Moderation” from the Pravda writer)