So while the women can get mammograms at NFL games ….

Posted by Texas Betsy Monday, October 5th, 2009

So while women can get mammograms at NFL games …. the men and women of Central Texas can get health care at their local Harley dealership.  But, in perfect parallel to NFL fans being told to encourage their wives, sisters and mothers to get mammograms, this ad tells women to send the men in their lives to the Harley dealership.

CTAS Harley Health Fest

More info here.

Any chance we might all be able to get our health care at, ya know, a doctor’s office?!?

h/t Gnome de Plume

Breast Cancer Awareness & the NFL

Posted by Texas Betsy Sunday, October 4th, 2009

large-logo nfl pink

So here I am on day 6 of the invasion of the crud into my throat, so grateful to have the NFL on my television instead of yet more Law & Order reruns. According to the announcers during the pre-game shows, this is breast cancer-awareness week in the NFL, meaning that many players and coaches are wearing pink accents and encouraging the sisters, mothers and daughters of their fans to get annual mammograms beginning in their 40′s.

Okaaaaayyyyyyy.

Thank you. Appreciate the effort and appreciate that you’re back on with a whole new slate of games.

pink glove

I don’t want to sound ungrateful. But …… a few questions, if you don’t mind.

  1. Other than a pink stripe, why no mention on the NFL website during the games?
  2. What about your female fans in their 40′s and beyond? Some of us are even watching without a husband, father or son.
  3. Are any of the multi-millionaire players, announcers or coaches giving money to help women afford mammograms? Or supporting universal screening even among the uninsured? What about supporting the funding of cancer treatment?
  4. Who paid for the pink stripes on the caps, cleats, etc.?
  5. What other health care does the NFL support? Can poor fans access your team MRI machines during the off-season? When the team is traveling?
  6. October is also domestic violence awareness month. Are any of the NFL players involved in helping men find non-abusive ways of existing in relationship with their partners? Helping victims escape and recover from abusive relationships?

Opinions welcome.

UPDATE: I take it back. There is a “why pink” link at the top of the NFL home page.

in partnership with the American Cancer Society, is focused on the importance of annual screenings, especially for women who are over the age of 40. Throughout October, NFL games will feature players, coaches and referees wearing pink game apparel to raise awareness for the campaign, as well as on-field pink ribbon stencils and special K-balls and pink coins. All apparel worn at games by players and coaches and special K-balls and pink coins will auctioned off at NFL Auction (www.NFLAuction.NFL.com), with proceeds benefitting the American Cancer Society and team charities.

Hollywood Stars Defend Health Insurance Executives

Posted by Texas Betsy Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Excellent snark. Excellent PSA.

Protect Insurance Companies PSA from Will Ferrell

via TPM & MoveOn.

Take-away line? Join us in the fight to look out for our Insurance Company Profits.
Excellent video

Bill Moyers on Obama and Healthcare

Posted by Texas Betsy Saturday, September 5th, 2009

Transcript via Citizen of Earth:

BILL MOYERS: The editors of THE ECONOMIST magazine say America’s health care debate has become a touch delirious, with people accusing each other of being evil-mongers, dealers in death, and un-American.

Well, that’s charitable.

I would say it’s more deranged than delirious, and definitely not un-American.

Those crackpots on the right praying for Obama to die and be sent to hell — they’re the warp and woof of home-grown nuttiness. So is the creature from the Second Amendment who showed up at the President’s rally armed to the teeth. He’s certainly one of us. Red, white, and blue kooks are as American as apple pie and conspiracy theories.

Bill Maher asked me on his show last week if America is still a great nation. I should’ve said it’s the greatest show on earth. Forget what you learned in civics about the Founding Fathers — we’re the children of Barnum and Bailey, our founding con-men. Their freak show was the forerunner of today’s talk radio.

Speaking of which: we’ve posted on our website an essay by the media scholar Henry Giroux. He describes the growing domination of hate radio as one of the crucial elements in a “culture of cruelty” increasingly marked by overt racism, hostility and disdain for others, coupled with a simmering threat of mob violence toward any political figure who believes health care reform is the most vital of safety nets, especially now that the central issue of life and politics is no longer about working to get ahead, but struggling simply to survive.

So here we are, wallowing in our dysfunction. Governed — if you listen to the rabble rousers — by a black nationalist from Kenya smuggled into the United States to kill Sarah Palin’s baby. And yes, I could almost buy their belief that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, only I think he shipped them to Washington, where they’ve been recycled as lobbyists and trained in the alchemy of money laundering, which turns an old-fashioned bribe into a First Amendment right.

Only in a fantasy capital like Washington could Sunday morning talk shows become the high church of conventional wisdom, with partisan shills treated as holy men whose gospel of prosperity always seems to boil down to lower taxes for the rich.

Poor Obama. He came to town preaching the religion of nice. But every time he bows politely, the harder the Republicans kick him.

No one’s ever conquered Washington politics by constantly saying “pretty please” to the guys trying to cut your throat.

Let’s get on with it, Mr. President. We’re up the proverbial creek with spaghetti as our paddle. This health care thing could have been the crossing of the Delaware, the turning point in the next American Revolution — the moment we put the mercenaries to rout, as General Washington did the Hessians at Trenton. We could have stamped our victory “Made in the USA.” We could have said to the world, “Look what we did!” And we could have turned to each other and said, “thank you.”

As it is, we’re about to get health care reform that measures human beings only in corporate terms of a cost-benefit analysis. I mean this is topsy-turvy — we should be treating health as a condition, not a commodity.

As we speak, Pfizer, the world’s largest drug maker, has been fined a record $2.3 billion dollars as a civil and criminal — yes, that’s criminal, as in fraud — penalty for promoting prescription drugs with the subtlety of the Russian mafia. It’s the fourth time in a decade Pfizer’s been called on the carpet — and these are the people into whose tender mercies Congress and the White House would deliver us?

Come on, Mr. President. Show us America is more than a circus or a market. Remind us of our greatness as a democracy. When you speak to Congress next week, just come out and say it. We thought we heard you say during the campaign last year that you want a government run insurance plan alongside private insurance — mostly premium-based, with subsidies for low-and-moderate income people. Open to all individuals and employees who want to join and with everyone free to choose the doctors we want. We thought you said Uncle Sam would sign on as our tough, cost-minded negotiator standing up to the cartel of drug and insurance companies and Wall Street investors whose only interest is a company’s share price and profits.

Here’s a suggestion, Mr. President: ask Josh Marshall to draft your speech. Josh is the founder of the website talkingpointsmemo.com . He’s a journalist and historian, not a politician. He doesn’t split things down the middle and call it a victory for the masses. He’s offered the simplest and most accurate description yet of a public insurance plan; one that essentially asks people: would you like the option — the voluntary option — of buying into Medicare before you’re 65? Check it out, Mr. President.

This health care thing is make or break for your leadership, but for us, it’s life and death. No more Mr. Nice Guy, Mr. President. We need a fighter.

Where Do We Stand on Health Care?

Posted by Texas Betsy Friday, September 4th, 2009

And exactly how MUCH of the store has Obama given away even before the game started?

Here are some perspectives you may not have seen.

Mexico’s health care lures Americans

By Chris Hawley | USA TODAY

It sounds almost too good to be true: a health care plan with no limits, no deductibles, free medicines, tests, X-rays, eyeglasses, even dental work — all for a flat fee of $250 or less a year.

To get it, you just have to move to Mexico.

and

“Thanks for keeping them honest”

This is what one CNN Talking Pundit Head just said to another CNN Talking Pundit Head after the head quoted the results of a “CNN research poll” that claims Obama is losing the support of the American people, they don’t support his economic polices and healthcare reform, blah, blah, blab, blab.  The economy and the recession aren’t improving under Obama, blah blah, blab, blab.Uh Oh, here comes the “Senior CNN Analyst” saying the republicans are gaining traction because more of you worry about the deficit. Oh really?

Now comes the question of the day, “When it comes to health care reform is 6 lobbyist per Congressman enough?”

Health Care (Lack of) Reform in Pictures

Posted by Texas Betsy Saturday, August 22nd, 2009

If you had to pick one editorial cartoon to represent what’s happening in the health care debate, which would it be?

I like this one, except that I don’t actually think Obama’s holding onto the public option as tightly as he seems to be in this cartoon.

What about this one?

Or this one?

What would you draw?

Not Only is it a Sucky, Watered Down Bill

Posted by Texas Betsy Monday, August 17th, 2009

But I bet it STILL won’t get any repiglican votes.

Weiner: No Public Option Loses 100 Votes In The House

from TalkLeft by Big Tent Democrat

Via FDL:

What that means is no public option means no health care reform. Whether Ezra Klein likes that or not, that’s the reality that Obama needs to deal with.

You have exactly 6 minutes to cry in your beer.  Then call your congress critters.  Call the white house.   And never ever trust a blue dog to do the right thing.

My only hope, and I am still holding about a tenth of a percent of hope, is that Obama says “Oops. Don’t have the votes.  Might as well go for socialized medicine single payer like most people wanted all along.”

Any Coverage of Chimpy’s “Death Panels”?

Posted by Texas Betsy Sunday, August 16th, 2009

right wing health care lies

When you go to your town hall meeting or health care rally, ask the deathers wrapped in the flags and the swastikas if they ever came to Texas to protest W’s death panels here?

For those who don’t like Wikipedia as a source (bravo, actually), here is the relevant section of the Texas Health and Safety Code that essentially allows a medical facility to decide whether it wants to continue giving life-sustaining treatment, even against the wishes of the patient or family.

Focus on Section 166.046, Subsection E, which allows:

If an attending physician refuses to honor a patient’s advance directive or a health care or treatment decision made by or on behalf of a patient, the physician’s refusal shall be reviewed by an ethics or medical committee. The attending physician may not be a member of that committee. The patient shall be given life-sustaining treatment during the review.

So if a patient or his/her family don’t agree with the physician, it goes before a board to decide the patient’s fate.  But wait, there’s more:

If the attending physician, the patient, or the person responsible for the health care decisions of the individual does not agree with the decision reached during the review process under Subsection (b), the physician shall make a reasonable effort to transfer the patient to a physician who is willing to comply with the directive. If the patient is a patient in a health care facility, the facility’s personnel shall assist the physician in arranging the patient’s transfer…

So what happens if these Texas death panels end up winning – against the wishes of the family?

A person does not commit an offense under Section 22.08, Penal Code, by withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from a qualified patient in accordance with this subchapter.

Immunity from civil or criminal prosecution.

via clammyc at Kos

Did Sarah Palin care at all for the fate of Sun Hudson, a desperately ill and poor (but non-white) baby here in Texas?  He was killed under the “Texas Futile Care Law,” which sounds a whole lot worse than a proposal for medicare recipients to be able to discuss advanced directives.

kill-me-baby2
original image via http://dequalss.com/

Pro-life my granny’s big toe!

HEALTHCARE 1 Pictures, Images and Photos

What Should Progressives DO About the Health Care Debate

Posted by Texas Betsy Sunday, August 9th, 2009

What can we do besides calling it health care reform and not switching the name to health insurance reform?

  • Should we go to our congress critters’ recess rallies?
  • Should we march in the streets?
  • Should we call our senators’ offices?
  • Should we pressure crazy Aunt Ida to stop asking congress to leave her medicare alone?

What works? In order to enter the comment section of this post, you must bring one (serious or snarky) suggestion or a link to someone else’s suggestion elsewhere in liberal/progressive blogistan & radioville.

So What Would It Take …. ?

Posted by Texas Betsy Monday, August 3rd, 2009

What do you think it would take for the corporate, for-profit media to report on the aftermath of hurricanes? To follow any non-birth-certificate, non-beer summit, non-sexual story?

How many newspapers outside of Texas carried this story at all? What else are they missing? New Orleans and the LA & Mississippi gulf coast are completely recovered from Hurricane Katrina, right? RIGHT???

Nearly a year after Ike, ER returns at UTMB

from HoustonChronicleThe reopening of Galveston’s full-service emergency center today takes the burden off other area hospitals inundated with extra patients.

Before Ike, UTMB had one of the area’s three Level 1 trauma centers, which have the facilities and doctors to treat the sickest patients at any hour. The 10½-month hiatus means the center, which treated 64,000 patients a year, lost its top rating from the American College of Surgeons.

But officials said the facility can provide the same emergency and trauma care offered prior to the storm.

“We’re still seeing Level 1 trauma patients,” said Michael Hill, associate chief operating officer of UTMB hospitals.

He estimates that with the area’s reduced population, the emergency center could treat 44,000 to 50,000 patients in the next year.

Wait? You mean they’re not all back? Where did they go? How many died? Are they going back?

(more…)

Laffy has the BEST chart up

Posted by Texas Betsy Friday, July 24th, 2009

(no offense to Tengrain of COURSE!)

The Health Care Chart Obama Doesn’t Want You to See

By GottaLaff

Via our pal That’s Right Nate:

Apparently, after I went through all this work [creating the chart], it turns out that a Republican congressman had created a chart for Obama’s socialized medicine, but I’m not sure if it was the House bill or the Senate bill and I don’t actually even know what Obama’s plan is. Still, this chart shows why our current plan works best.

A DEATH Dive??

Posted by Texas Betsy Friday, May 29th, 2009

The Texas budget is on its way to the governor’s desk. Windstorm insurance reform survived another day. Expanded health care coverage for low-income children is still in a death dive.

A Death Dive?  A DEATH dive?  Given how many Texas children die each year from untreated illnesses, is this the best phrase that the Houston Chronicle could come up with??  Oy!

p.s.  Thanks scissorheads for all the “get well soon” wishes.  Doing much better now after spending a few hours on the porch.

Let’s Give ALL the Money

Posted by Texas Betsy Friday, May 15th, 2009

to the insurance company executives and their lobbyists, right?

single-payer

WTF?!? Universal Healthcare advocates forcibly removed from US Senate Hearing on … (wait for it) …. HEALTHCARE

[More from Laura Flanders]

Baucus v. Democracy

By David Swanson

I can’t recall a better corporate news video segment in at least the past decade than the story that Ed Schultz just aired on MSNBC in which he interviews Margaret Flowers of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) and Senator Debbie Stabenow on the topic of healthcare reform.Here’s video.


Sure, Ed slaps a gratuitous insult on the heroines of Code Pink, says he’s against protesting and “getting arrested” as a rule but thinks it’s OK if doctors in suits and “educated professional people” do it, and pretends to believe (or actually believes) that President Obama favors considering the possibility of creating single-payer healthcare. But the heart of this story is the gaping chasm between majority opinion and the corporate agenda of the United States Senate.  And Ed Schultz hits it out of the park.

Ed goes after the health insurance companies, the pharmaceutical companies, and the HMOs. He plays video of activist Kevin Zeese speaking up at the recent Senate Finance Committee hearing and being arrested. He explains perfectly what single-payer healthcare is. (I recommend this flyer (PDF).) And he denounces the anti-democratic exclusion of single-payer advocates by Committee Chairman Max Baucus.

And then Ed brings on Margaret Flowers who absolutely nails every question he asks, and he asks the right questions. Flowers lists the polls showing that over 60 percent of Americans and 60 percent of physicians want single-payer, explains that PNHP has 16,000 members and is part of the Leadership Conference for Guaranteed Healthcare which has 20 million members. Flowers points out that the next senate hearing is on March 12th and that advocates are asking for at least one supporter of single-payer to be included.

That sort of mention of an upcoming event and very nearly inclusion of exactly what people can do to improve their country is rare indeed on our televisions. Let me take it a slight step further: Senator Max Baucus’s phone number is (202) 224-2651.


Surprised? Nope.

Posted by Texas Betsy Thursday, October 30th, 2008

And it’s far easier to get insurance to pay for viagra than birth control. So why should this surprise anyone?

Women Buying Health Policies Pay a Penalty

Women pay much more than men of the same age for individual health insurance policies.

Published: October 29, 2008

WASHINGTON — Striking new evidence has emerged of a widespread gap in the cost of health insurance, as women pay much more than men of the same age for individual insurance policies providing identical coverage, according to new data from insurance companies and online brokers.

Some insurance executives expressed surprise at the size and prevalence of the disparities, which can make a woman’s insurance cost hundreds of dollars a year more than a man’s. Women’s advocacy groups have raised concerns about the differences, and members of Congress have begun to question the justification for them.

The new findings, which are not easily explained away, come amid anxiety about the declining economy. More and more people are shopping for individual health insurance policies because they have lost jobs that provided coverage. Politicians of both parties have offered proposals that would expand the role of the individual market, giving people tax credits or other assistance to buy coverage on their own.

“Women often fare worse than men in the individual insurance market,” said Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana and chairman of the Finance Committee.

Insurers say they have a sound reason for charging different premiums: Women ages 19 to 55 tend to cost more than men because they typically use more health care, especially in the childbearing years.

But women still pay more than men for insurance that does not cover maternity care. In the individual market, maternity coverage may be offered as an optional benefit, or rider, for a hefty additional premium.

And how will McCain’s health care “plan” help?

Without substantial changes in the individual market, Ms. Greenberger said, tax credits for the purchase of insurance will be worth less to women because they face higher premiums.

Color me shocked.